Rover 75 1999 vs Rover 45 1999

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Rover 45
1999 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP117 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds10.3 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 3 HP more power than Rover 45, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.7
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway820 km on highway
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.36 m
Width: 1.78 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Rover 75 is larger.
Rover 75 is 39 cm longer than the Rover 45, 8 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres717 litres
Rover 75 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 (by 285 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Rover 45, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`640
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1800800
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Rover 45 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv