Rover 75 2001 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 7 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 12.9 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |