Rover 75 2001 vs SAAB 9-5 1999

 
Rover 75
2001 - 2004
SAAB 9-5
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP230 HP
Torque: 185 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds8.5 seconds
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 80 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 165 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.710.1
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway1040 km on highway
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 75 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Rover 45Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.81 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.50 m
Rover 75 is smaller.
Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1222 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`800
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 20001000
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
SAAB 9-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv