Rover 75 2001 vs Renault Laguna 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Laguna, but torque is 6 NM less than Renault Laguna. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Laguna engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 45 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2002 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Laguna 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 75 is 9 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |