Rover 75 2003 vs Volvo V70 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Rover 75 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo V70. Despite less power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo V70 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Rover 75 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |