Rover 75 2003 vs Citroen C5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 41 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |