Rover 75 2003 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.98 m | |
| Rover 75 is 22 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 56 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 3500 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 1000 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 2278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |