Rover 75 2003 vs Citroen C5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 21 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |