Rover 75 2003 vs Ford Tourneo 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.98 m | |
| Rover 75 is 22 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 56 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
| |