Rover 75 2001 vs Volvo V70 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo V70 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo V70 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Rover 75 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |