Rover 75 2001 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

	Rover 75 2001 - 2004	Volkswagen Passat 2000 - 2005
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Diesel	1.9 Diesel
Performance
Power:	116 HP	100 HP
Torque:	260 NM	250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	13.8 seconds	15 seconds
	Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 16 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.9	6.9
Fuel tank capacity:	65 litres	62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	940 km in combined cycle	890 km in combined cycle
	1250 km on highway	1140 km on highway
	890 km with real consumption	910 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.79 m	4.68 m
Width:	1.78 m	1.75 m
Height:	1.42 m	1.50 m
	Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	400 litres	495 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	1222 litres	no data
	Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter:	11.4 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	no data	2`020 kg

Safety:
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	2000	1400
Pros and Cons:	Rover 75 has more power more dynamic more full fuel tank mileage	Volkswagen Passat has roomier boot lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Rover 75 2001 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions