Rover 75 2001 vs Volvo XC70 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
| Volvo XC70 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC70 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.56 m | |
| Rover 75 is 6 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |