Rover 75 2001 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 24 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 576 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 176 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Accord (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Accord has
| |