Rover 75 2001 vs Ford Mondeo 2000

 
Rover 75
2001 - 2004
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP115 HP
Torque: 260 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11 seconds
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1190 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1222 litres1700 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 478 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight: 2`090 kgno data
Safety:
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 20001000
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Mondeo has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv