Rover 75 2002 vs Volvo V70 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 100 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Rover 75 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |