Rover 75 2002 vs Renault Laguna 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 27 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.6 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 75 is 9 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 3 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |