Rover 75 2004 vs Rover 75 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Rover 75 2004 and Rover 75 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Rover 75 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Rover 75 2004 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 2004 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 2004 is 4 cm longer than the Rover 75 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 432 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Rover 75 2004 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Rover 75 2004. This could mean that the Rover 75 2004 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 75 2004 (by 790 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 75 has
| |