Rover 75 2004 vs Citroen C5 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 33 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 563 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1658 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |