Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP110 HP
Torque: 300 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds13 seconds
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 75 engine produces 21 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.7
Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1340 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.74 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.46 m
Rover 75 is larger, but lower.
Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres526 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1222 litres1741 litres
Peugeot 406 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 519 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`075
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1600no data
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Peugeot 406 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv