Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 21 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 526 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1741 litres | |
Peugeot 406 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 519 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |