Rover 75 2004 vs SAAB 9-5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 61 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 90 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 4 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |