Rover 75 2004 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Rover 75) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Accord) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 39 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 70 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1222 litres | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Accord (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Accord, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`545 kg | 1`465 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 565 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |