Rover 75 2004 vs Citroen C5 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 6 HP more power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C5. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 563 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |