Rover 75 2004 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
| Rover 75 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 203 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |