Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP90 HP
Torque: 260 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds13.4 seconds
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 75 engine produces 26 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.9
Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1450 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.74 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.46 m
Rover 75 is larger, but lower.
Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres526 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1222 litres1740 litres
Peugeot 406 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 518 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`075
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1600no data
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Peugeot 406 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv