Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |