Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Rover 75 engine produces 3 HP more power than Peugeot 406, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.9 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 518 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 406. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |