Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Rover 75 engine produces 3 HP more power than Peugeot 406, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1740 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 406. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |