Rover 75 2004 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 13.2 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`003 | ~ 1`577 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |