Rover 75 2004 vs Rover 75 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 116 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 160 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 13.2 seconds | 9.5 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 5.8 - 11.1 | |
|
Rover 75 2004 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 75 1999. On average, a Rover 75 2004 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Rover 75 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Rover 75 2004 and Rover 75 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`003 | ~ 2`003 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |