Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Rover 75 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 13.2 seconds | 10.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 8.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Evanda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`003 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |