Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Rover 75 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 177 HP | 130 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 300 NM | 195 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.2 seconds | 6.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 11.1 | 5.7 - 13.0 | |
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 551 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`003 | ~ 2`127 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |