Rover 75 2001 vs Volvo V70 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 75 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.3 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 177 HP | 140 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 300 NM | 192 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14 seconds | 5.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.7 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Rover 75 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 419 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 2`123 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |