Rover 75 2001 vs Honda Accord 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 177 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 300 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14 seconds | 8.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.7 | 5.8 - 10.0 | |
|
On average, the Rover 75 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda Accord. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 576 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 176 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Accord (by 435 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Accord has
| |