Rover 75 2001 vs Citroen C5 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.7 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 177 HP | 90 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 300 NM | 160 - 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14 seconds | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.7 | 5.7 - 10.3 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C5. On average, a Rover 75 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen C5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |