Rover 75 2001 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Rover 75 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Tourneo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Rover 75 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 177 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 300 NM | 220 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 14 seconds | 12.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
| In general, Rover 75 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Tourneo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.7 | 6.0 - 6.4 | |
|
On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.91 m | |
| Rover 75 is 34 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 49 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1222 litres | 3500 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 2278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`040 kg | ~ 2`220 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`510 kg | ~ 1`518 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 530 kg | ~ 702 kg | |
| Rover 75 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem less than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |