Rover 75 2004 vs Citroen C5 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 110 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 160 - 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 14 seconds | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 5.5 - 10.0 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C5. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 563 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 1`473 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |