Rover 75 2004 vs Peugeot 406 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 | 1.7 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 90 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 160 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 14 seconds | 9.4 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 5.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 406. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 1440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1741 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 1040 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 519 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |