Renault Megane 2021 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.2 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
987 litres | 1138 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 151 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`894 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |