Renault Megane 2020 vs Kia Ceed 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 21 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 2 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1432 litres | 1581 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | 1`960 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`315 kg | 1`407 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 553 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |