Renault Megane 2020 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 38 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Renault Megane and Volvo V40 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1258 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Renault Megane has 78 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 242 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`826 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |