Renault Megane 2020 vs Skoda Scala 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Scala. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Scala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Scala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 101 mm (4 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane and Skoda Scala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1258 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 65 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Scala, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`826 kg | 1`668 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`305 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 616 kg | 363 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Skoda Scala. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |