Renault Megane 2020 vs Skoda Scala 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Renault Megane and Skoda Scala have the same engine power, but Renault Megane torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Scala. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Scala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 101 mm (4 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane and Skoda Scala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1191 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 132 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 219 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`883 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`241 kg | 1`239 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 642 kg | 521 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Skoda Scala. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |