Renault Megane 2020 vs Cupra Born 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Cupra Born is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 116 HP less power than Cupra Born, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Cupra Born. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 16.7 kWh/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| Cupra Born gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Cupra Born) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 4 cm longer than the Cupra Born, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1191 litres | 1267 litres | |
|
Cupra Born has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Cupra Born (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1 metres more than that of the Cupra Born, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Cupra Born has
| |