Renault Megane 2020 vs Citroen C4 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Megane) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen C4) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 170 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 735 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 101 mm (4 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Citroen C4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Citroen C4 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 86 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`921 kg | 1`795 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`351 kg | 1`324 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 471 kg | |
| Renault Megane load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Citroen C4. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |