Renault Megane 2018 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Renault Megane
2018 - 2020
Volvo V40
2016 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP152 HP
Torque: 240 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Megane engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres62 litres
730 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.37 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 407 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1247 litres1500 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 83 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 253 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`814no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 60013 200
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • roomier boot
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv