Renault Megane 2015 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 12 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2015 1.2 engine: The Renault 1.2 TCe engine (H5FT) is a four-cylinder, fully aluminum turbocharged unit equipped with a 16-valve cylinder head without hydraulic lifters. It features direct fuel injection, a timing chain drive, variable valve timing on both camshafts, ... More about Renault Megane 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 81 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |