Renault Megane 2014 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2014 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 81 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`824 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |