Renault Megane 2014 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 130 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 615 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Laguna | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 30 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 81 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`909 | 1`711 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |