Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Clio 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 85 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1500 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
1150 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 28 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 117 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`797 | 1`655 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 5000 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |