Renault Megane 2012 vs Mercedes A class 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 24 HP more power than Mercedes A class, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mercedes A class. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1220 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
1070 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 93 mm (3.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Megane version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes Vito | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane and Mercedes A class are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 341 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | 1157 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 64 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes A class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 5 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Mercedes A class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 860 percent more cases than Mercedes A class, so Mercedes A class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5600 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |